article from April 4, 2011
by Jamie Douglas
First off, let me state unequivocally that I consider both
the terms “ecotourism” and “green tourism” to be oxymorons in the league with
“military intelligence.”
I am proud to say that I have never paid the extra 50% to
the organizers of an eco-tour to make me feel better. Your feel-good ecotourism
adventure likely starts out with a trip to the airport in a motor vehicle, and
then it’s onto a jet plane, which deposits tons of carbon in the upper
atmosphere, to be followed by a stinking diesel bus ride to your final
destination, with a stay in a comfortable, air conditioned room topping off the
orgy of carbon emissions your green vacation requires to get you there to
supposedly make a positive impact on the local environment.
So now that you are in the neighborhood, there are all these
wonderful side excursions you can take, powered by diesel bus or van, outboard
motors, large diesel ship engines, helicopters and small planes contributing
more than your share of carbon to the free and formerly unspoiled locales you
have come to admire. Whether in the Central American rainforests or cloud forests
like Costa Rica’s Monteverde, where enthusiastic entrepreneurs have constructed
their platforms and strung steel cables through the jungle canopy so that
people can go zipping through the treetops, building more and more roads and
infrastructure in order to give more and more tourists access to delicate
environmental regions is a strange way of protecting them. In Monteverde alone,
there are dozens of companies that draw people to this remote location and operate
with very little oversight from the Costa Rican government, as the almighty
tourist dollar is the green currency.
A similarly sad situation exists in Manuel Antonio National
Park in Quepos, along the central Pacific coast of Costa Rica. And on the
Caribbean coast, as well as many other interesting locations in the world, you
will find natural settings that are being exploited as “green tourism.”
Costa Rica has carefully created and groomed this
eco-tourism myth by having a large percentage of its national territory
designated as national parks, nature preserves and “Indian” reservations. The
myth about it is that they have long looked the other way when it comes to gold
mines, rare tropical wood harvesting and the neglect of the indigenous
population. When it comes to enforcing regulations that give the appearance
that the government is environmentally aware, it very often just doesn’t
happen.
Back in 1975, I stayed with the Boruca people in the
southern mountains of Costa Rica, collecting oral histories and taking many a
photograph for a presentation when I had to leave suddenly due to a medical
emergency. I did not return to the area until 1995, when I announced to my two
traveling companions that once we reached the edge of the ridge and had a view
into the valley where the reservation is, they would be astonished at the
amount of pristine rainforest that they would see.
Well, what a difference 20 years made. Virtually all the old-growth
trees were gone, replaced by banana plantations and mining scars. The formerly
majestic river running through the valley had been reduced to a trickle, and
the population of the village was a fraction of what it once was. Most of the
youth had left to become maids, gardeners and, sadly, prostitutes in the growing
tourist towns along the Pacific coast, which had also undergone an incredible
transformation. The then-new coastal highway was allowing developers access to formerly
isolated areas where they had begun building without regulation or regard, also
bringing in an influx of drug traffickers that facilitated the transport of cocaine
from Colombia to the USA and Europe.
The Osa Peninsula, home to Central America’s largest
protected area of tropical wet forests, suffered from the continued looting of
valuable timber resources while Canadian, Australian, and US mining interests
had established themselves with impunity by paying the necessary officials off –
those same officials who were also paid large sums of cash to look the other
way when airplanes and ships came in for refueling. In the mean time, the local
population of the Osa Peninsula was left behind as one of the most
poverty-stricken regions in Costa Rica.
So is Costa Rica really an eco-paradise?
Costa Rica was at the vanguard of the “ecotourism” movement,
which was no doubt initiated with the best of intentions. But today, with
carbon trading being more of a feel-good excuse than a solution and the “green”
image so easily taken advantage of by corruption and greed, we have to be
honest with ourselves, thoughtful about our actions and ever more diligent
about verifying claims being made if we really want to do what is best for the
planet.
The better question might be, can Costa Rica actually live
up to its green image?
Jamie Douglas
Patagonia
I encourage you to write me at cruzansailor [at] gmail [dot] com with
any questions or suggestions you may have. Disclaimer: I am not in any
travel-related business. My advice is based on my own experiences and is free
of charge (Donations welcome). It is always my pleasure to act as a beneficial
counselor to those who are seekers of the next adventure.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated and do not appear immediately after posting. Thank you very much for your thoughts and input.